CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 335
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 540 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 335 vs Challenger 75C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 75C
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 335
vs
ChallengerChallenger 75C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 335 higher · +10 hp (+3%)Steiger 335335 hp
75C325 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 335 is in the 97th percentile; 75C is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75C higher · +89 ci (+16%)Steiger 335540 ci
75C629 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 335 is in the 94th percentile; 75C is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 3356
75C6
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 335 is in the 93rd percentile; 75C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Steiger 335 higher · +6 (+60%)Steiger 33516
75C10
Median Utility Tractor12
Steiger 335 is in the 73rd percentile; 75C is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Steiger 335 (A)75C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 335 | 75C | — |
| Category | Utility | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3176 ATAAC | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 325hp | ▲ Steiger 335+10 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 75C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 540ci | 629ci | ▲ 75C+89 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 75C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.5in | ▲ Steiger 335+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | 36.5in | 120in | ▲ 75C+83.5 in · +229% |
| Height | Not recorded | 144in | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,120lb | 33,305lb | ▲ 75C+1,185 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Parallel pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydraulic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear 1000 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydraulic | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 15gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 97th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (540 ci)B · 95th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 98th percentile (32,120 lb)B · 98th percentile (33,305 lb)
A · Steiger 335B · 75CMedian Utility Tractor