Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 385
Utility
- power
- 385 hp
- displacement
- 786 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 385 vs Challenger 1038
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 1038
Agricultural
- power
- 396 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 385
vs
ChallengerChallenger 1038
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1038 higher · +11 hp (+3%)Steiger 385385 hp
1038396 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 385 is in the 98th percentile; 1038 is in the 98th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Steiger 385 higher · +28 ci (+4%)Steiger 385786 ci
1038758 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 385 is in the 96th percentile; 1038 is in the 96th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 3856
10386
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 385 is in the 93rd percentile; 1038 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Steiger 385 higher · +9,990 lb (+32%)Steiger 38541,605 lb
103831,615 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Steiger 385 is in the 99th percentile; 1038 is in the 98th · 5,107 models
Steiger 385 (A)1038 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 385 | 1038 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | MAN | — |
| Power Output | 385hp | 396hp | ▲ 1038+11 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ Steiger 385+300 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 786ci | 758ci | ▲ Steiger 385+28 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ Steiger 385+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 6.5in | ▲ 1038+0.6 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously-Variable Transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 242in | — |
| Width | 44in | 108in | ▲ 1038+64 in · +145% |
| Height | Not recorded | 136in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 130in | — |
| Operating Weight | 41,605lb | 31,615lb | ▲ Steiger 385+9,990 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Parallel pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 4N | Rear Type IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter (24 volts) | Electric (24V) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 98th percentile (385 hp)B · 98th percentile (396 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 96th percentile (786 ci)B · 96th percentile (758 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 99th percentile (41,605 lb)B · 98th percentile (31,615 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 8th percentile (44 in)B · 98th percentile (108 in)
A · Steiger 385B · 1038Median Utility Tractor