Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 450
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 450 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH Steiger 450 vs Challenger MT975E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT975E
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 450
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT975E higher · +150 hp (+33%)Steiger 450450 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
Steiger 450 is in the 64th percentile; MT975E is in the 92nd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT975E higher · +238 ci (+30%)Steiger 450787 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
Steiger 450 is in the 39th percentile; MT975E is in the 87th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)Steiger 4506
MT975E12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
Steiger 450 is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 45016
MT975E16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
Steiger 450 is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 50th · 146 models
Steiger 450 (A)MT975E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 450 | MT975E | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 450hp | 600hp | ▲ MT975E+150 hp · +33% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ Steiger 450+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ MT975E+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 787ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT975E+238 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 5.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 36,048lb | 47,500lb | ▲ MT975E+11,452 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 42x27.95 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 42x27.95 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | 4N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Electro-hydraulic wet discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 450 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 64th percentile (450 hp)B · 92nd percentile (600 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 39th percentile (787 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 47th percentile (36,048 lb)B · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · Steiger 450B · MT975EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor