Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 535
Utility
- power
- 535 hp
- displacement
- 915 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 535 vs Challenger MT865C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT865C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 534 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 535
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT865C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 535 higher · +1 hp (<1%)Steiger 535535 hp
MT865C534 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 535 is in the 99th percentile; MT865C is in the 99th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT865C higher · +190 ci (+21%)Steiger 535915 ci
MT865C1,105 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 535 is in the 99th percentile; MT865C is in the 99th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 5356
MT865C6
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 535 is in the 93rd percentile; MT865C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 53516
MT865C16
Median Utility Tractor12
Steiger 535 is in the 73rd percentile; MT865C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Steiger 535 (A)MT865C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 535 | MT865C | — |
| Category | Utility | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | QSX15 | C18 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 535hp | 534hp | ▲ Steiger 535+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 915ci | 1,105ci | ▲ MT865C+190 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 5.7in | ▲ MT865C+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 7.2in | ▲ MT865C+0.5 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Caterpillar Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 270in | — |
| Width | 44in | 142in | ▲ MT865C+98 in · +223% |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 42,639lb | 43,125lb | ▲ MT865C+486 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Parallel pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 4N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 99th percentile (535 hp)B · 99th percentile (534 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (915 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 99th percentile (42,639 lb)B · 99th percentile (43,125 lb)
A · Steiger 535B · MT865CMedian Utility Tractor