Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT865C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 534 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT865C vs Fendt 1154 MT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 1154 MT
Crawler
- power
- 490 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT865C
vs
FendtFendt 1154 MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT865C higher · +44 hp (+9%)MT865C534 hp
1154 MT490 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT865C is in the 83rd percentile; 1154 MT is in the 72nd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT865C higher · +80 ci (+8%)MT865C1,105 ci
1154 MT1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT865C is in the 91st percentile; 1154 MT is in the 87th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ 1154 MT higher · +6 (+100%)MT865C6
1154 MT12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT865C is in the 50th percentile; 1154 MT is in the 99th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT865C16
1154 MT16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT865C is in the 50th percentile; 1154 MT is in the 50th · 146 models
MT865C (A)1154 MT (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT865C | 1154 MT | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | C18 ACERT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 534hp | 490hp | ▲ MT865C+44 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ 1154 MT+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT865C+80 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 5.7in | 4.4in | ▲ MT865C+1.3 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 7.2in | 5.7in | ▲ MT865C+1.5 in · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Caterpillar Powershift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 270in | 266in | ▲ MT865C+4 in · +2% |
| Width | 142in | 118in | ▲ MT865C+24 in · +20% |
| Height | 138in | 136in | ▲ MT865C+2 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 43,125lb | 42,692lb | ▲ MT865C+433 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | IV/III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Fendt 1154 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 83rd percentile (534 hp)B · 72nd percentile (490 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 68th percentile (43,125 lb)B · 66th percentile (42,692 lb)
A · MT865CB · 1154 MTMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor