Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 580
Utility
- power
- 580 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 580 vs Challenger MT975E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT975E
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 580
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT975E higher · +20 hp (+3%)Steiger 580580 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 580 is in the 99th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT975E higher · +238 ci (+30%)Steiger 580787 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 580 is in the 97th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)Steiger 5806
MT975E12
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 580 is in the 93rd percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 58016
MT975E16
Median Utility Tractor12
Steiger 580 is in the 73rd percentile; MT975E is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Steiger 580 (A)MT975E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 580 | MT975E | — |
| Category | Utility | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 580hp | 600hp | ▲ MT975E+20 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ Steiger 580+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ MT975E+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 787ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT975E+238 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 5.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 300in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 156in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 48,147lb | 47,500lb | ▲ Steiger 580+647 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensated | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic articulated | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 42x27.95 | 42x27.95 | Same |
| Rear Tire Size | 42x27.95 | 42x27.95 | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic articulated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 99th percentile (580 hp)B · 99th percentile (600 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 97th percentile (787 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 99th percentile (48,147 lb)B · 99th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · Steiger 580B · MT975EMedian Utility Tractor