Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 580
Utility
- power
- 580 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 580 vs Woods & Copeland 600C
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B
Woods & Copeland 600C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,150 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 580
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 600C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 600C higher · +20 hp (+3%)Steiger 580580 hp
600C600 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 580 is in the 99th percentile; 600C is in the 99th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 600C higher · +363 ci (+46%)Steiger 580787 ci
600C1,150 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 580 is in the 97th percentile; 600C is in the 99th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 5806
600C6
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 580 is in the 93rd percentile; 600C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Steiger 580 higher · +4 (+33%)Steiger 58016
600C12
Median Utility Tractor12
Steiger 580 is in the 73rd percentile; 600C is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Steiger 580 (A)600C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Woods & Copeland | — |
| Model | Steiger 580 | 600C | — |
| Category | Utility | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | KTA-1150C | — |
| Power Output | 580hp | 600hp | ▲ 600C+20 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 787ci | 1,150ci | ▲ 600C+363 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 5.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 300in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 156in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 48,147lb | 42,600lb | ▲ Steiger 580+5,547 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic articulated | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 42x27.95 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 42x27.95 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic articulated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 99th percentile (580 hp)B · 99th percentile (600 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 97th percentile (787 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,150 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 99th percentile (48,147 lb)B · 99th percentile (42,600 lb)
A · Steiger 580B · 600CMedian Utility Tractor