Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac
Crawler
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Crawler
CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac vs Challenger MT975E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT975E
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedSteiger 600 Quadtrac600 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
Steiger 600 Quadtrac is in the 97th percentile; MT975E is in the 97th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT975E higher · +238 ci (+30%)Steiger 600 Quadtrac787 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
Steiger 600 Quadtrac is in the 81st percentile; MT975E is in the 96th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)Steiger 600 Quadtrac6
MT975E12
Median Crawler Tractor6
Steiger 600 Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 192 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 600 Quadtrac16
MT975E16
Median Crawler Tractor10
Steiger 600 Quadtrac is in the 69th percentile; MT975E is in the 69th · 179 models
Steiger 600 Quadtrac (A)MT975E (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 600 Quadtrac | MT975E | — |
| Category | Crawler, Articulated | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 600hp | 600hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ Steiger 600 Quadtrac+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ MT975E+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 787ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT975E+238 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 5.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed full power shift | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 53,804lb | 47,500lb | ▲ Steiger 600 Quadtrac+6,304 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | hydraulic power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 42x27.95 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 42x27.95 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 4N | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | articulated crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | hydraulic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | electro-hydraulic wet discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 97th percentile (600 hp)B · 97th percentile (600 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 81st percentile (787 ci)B · 96th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 69th percentile (16)B · 69th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 94th percentile (53,804 lb)B · 91st percentile (47,500 lb)
A · Steiger 600 QuadtracB · MT975EMedian Crawler Tractor