Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 600
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH Steiger 600 vs Challenger MT875C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT875C
Articulated
- power
- 586 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 600
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT875C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 600 higher · +14 hp (+2%)Steiger 600600 hp
MT875C586 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
Steiger 600 is in the 92nd percentile; MT875C is in the 89th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT875C higher · +318 ci (+40%)Steiger 600787 ci
MT875C1,105 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
Steiger 600 is in the 39th percentile; MT875C is in the 91st · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 6006
MT875C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
Steiger 600 is in the 50th percentile; MT875C is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 60016
MT875C16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
Steiger 600 is in the 50th percentile; MT875C is in the 50th · 146 models
Steiger 600 (A)MT875C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 600 | MT875C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C18 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 600hp | 586hp | ▲ Steiger 600+14 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 787ci | 1,105ci | ▲ MT875C+318 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 5.7in | ▲ MT875C+0.4 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 7.2in | ▲ MT875C+1.3 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 270in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 45,868lb | 56,000lb | ▲ MT875C+10,132 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Electro-hydraulic wet discs | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 600 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 92nd percentile (600 hp)B · 89th percentile (586 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 39th percentile (787 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 79th percentile (45,868 lb)B · 95th percentile (56,000 lb)
A · Steiger 600B · MT875CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor