Head to head · Articulated

CaseIH Steiger 620 Quadtrac vs Challenger MT875C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT875C

Articulated

power
586 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT875C specs
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 620 Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT875C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated

n = 41–62

Engine Power

▲ Steiger 620 Quadtrac higher · +34 hp (+6%)
Steiger 620 Quadtrac620 hp
MT875C586 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp

Steiger 620 Quadtrac is in the 99th percentile; MT875C is in the 95th · 62 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT875C higher · +318 ci (+40%)
Steiger 620 Quadtrac787 ci
MT875C1,105 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci

Steiger 620 Quadtrac is in the 37th percentile; MT875C is in the 99th · 61 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Steiger 620 Quadtrac6
MT875C6
Median Articulated Tractor6

Steiger 620 Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT875C is in the 50th · 61 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Steiger 620 Quadtrac16
MT875C16
Median Articulated Tractor16

Steiger 620 Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT875C is in the 50th · 59 models

Steiger 620 Quadtrac (A)MT875C (B)Median Articulated Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracChallenger MT875CDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelSteiger 620 QuadtracMT875C—
CategoryArticulatedArticulatedSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracChallenger MT875CDifference
ManufacturerFPTCaterpillar—
ModelNot recordedC18 ACERT—
Power Output620hp586hp▲ Steiger 620 Quadtrac+34 hp · +6%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement787ci1,105ci▲ MT875C+318 ci · +40%
Bore5.3in5.7in▲ MT875C+0.4 in · +8%
Stroke5.9in7.2in▲ MT875C+1.3 in · +22%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracChallenger MT875CDifference
TypeFull power shiftSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracChallenger MT875CDifference
LengthNot recorded270in—
Width30in142in▲ MT875C+112 in · +373%
HeightNot recorded138in—
Operating Weight60,145lb56,000lb▲ Steiger 620 Quadtrac+4,145 lb · +7%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracChallenger MT875CDifference
System TypePressure Flow CompensatedClosed center pressure-flow compensated—
Steering TypeHydraulic articulatedElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracChallenger MT875CDifference
Hitch CategoryIVNNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracChallenger MT875CDifference
Drive TypeQuadtracNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydraulic articulatedElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracChallenger MT875CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 450 hp
A · 99th percentile (620 hp)B · 95th percentile (586 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 827 ci
A · 37th percentile (787 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 51,335 lb
A · 99th percentile (60,145 lb)B · 75th percentile (56,000 lb)
A · Steiger 620 QuadtracB · MT875CMedian Articulated Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Steiger 620 QuadtracFull spec pageChallenger MT875C