CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 620
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 620 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT862
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT862
Agricultural
- power
- 610 hp
- displacement
- 934 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 620
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT862
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 620 higher · +10 hp (+2%)Steiger 620620 hp
MT862610 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
Steiger 620 is in the 97th percentile; MT862 is in the 95th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT862 higher · +147 ci (+19%)Steiger 620787 ci
MT862934 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
Steiger 620 is in the 39th percentile; MT862 is in the 85th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 6206
MT8626
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
Steiger 620 is in the 50th percentile; MT862 is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ Steiger 620 higher · +6,147 lb (+15%)Steiger 62048,147 lb
MT86242,000 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
Steiger 620 is in the 87th percentile; MT862 is in the 63rd · 132 models
Steiger 620 (A)MT862 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 620 | MT862 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | MAN | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D3876 | — |
| Power Output | 620hp | 610hp | ▲ Steiger 620+10 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,730RPM | ▲ Steiger 620+370 RPM · +21% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 787ci | 934ci | ▲ MT862+147 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 5.4in | ▲ MT862+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 6.7in | ▲ MT862+0.8 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Continuously-variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 300in | 266in | ▲ Steiger 620+34 in · +13% |
| Width | 120in | 116in | ▲ Steiger 620+4 in · +3% |
| Height | 156in | 148in | ▲ Steiger 620+8 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 48,147lb | 42,000lb | ▲ Steiger 620+6,147 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | pressure flow compensated | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | hydraulic articulated | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | hydraulic articulated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Challenger MT862 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 97th percentile (620 hp)B · 95th percentile (610 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 39th percentile (787 ci)B · 85th percentile (934 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 87th percentile (48,147 lb)B · 63rd percentile (42,000 lb)
Length
median 275 inA · 79th percentile (300 in)B · 39th percentile (266 in)
A · Steiger 620B · MT862Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor