CaseIHModel A
CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac
Articulated
- power
- 425 hp
- displacement
- 915 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac vs Challenger MT835C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT835C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 402 hp
- displacement
- 928 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ STX425QT Quadtrac higher · +23 hp (+6%)STX425QT Quadtrac425 hp
MT835C402 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
STX425QT Quadtrac is in the 38th percentile; MT835C is in the 34th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT835C higher · +13 ci (+1%)STX425QT Quadtrac915 ci
MT835C928 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
STX425QT Quadtrac is in the 78th percentile; MT835C is in the 86th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSTX425QT Quadtrac6
MT835C6
Median Articulated Tractor6
STX425QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT835C is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSTX425QT Quadtrac16
MT835C16
Median Articulated Tractor16
STX425QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT835C is in the 50th · 59 models
STX425QT Quadtrac (A)MT835C (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | STX425QT Quadtrac | MT835C | — |
| Category | Articulated | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | QSX15 | C15 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 425hp | 402hp | ▲ STX425QT Quadtrac+23 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT835C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 915ci | 928ci | ▲ MT835C+13 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 5.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 6.8in | ▲ MT835C+0.1 in · +1% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 270in | — |
| Width | 44in | 142in | ▲ MT835C+98 in · +223% |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 53,264lb | 50,000lb | ▲ STX425QT Quadtrac+3,264 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Speed sensitive differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IVN/III | IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 (Quadtrac) | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Speed sensitive differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH STX425QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric, 12 volts | Electric, 12 volt | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 38th percentile (425 hp)B · 34th percentile (402 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 78th percentile (915 ci)B · 86th percentile (928 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 57th percentile (53,264 lb)B · 46th percentile (50,000 lb)
A · STX425QT QuadtracB · MT835CMedian Articulated Tractor