Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT835C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 402 hp
- displacement
- 928 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT835C vs John Deere 9R 390
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9R 390
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 371 hp
- displacement
- 826 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT835C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9R 390
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT835C higher · +31 hp (+8%)MT835C402 hp
9R 390371 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT835C is in the 55th percentile; 9R 390 is in the 47th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT835C higher · +102 ci (+12%)MT835C928 ci
9R 390826 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT835C is in the 84th percentile; 9R 390 is in the 50th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT835C6
9R 3906
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT835C is in the 50th percentile; 9R 390 is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9R 390 higher · +2 (+13%)MT835C16
9R 39018
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT835C is in the 50th percentile; 9R 390 is in the 86th · 146 models
MT835C (A)9R 390 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT835C | 9R 390 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | C15 ACERT | JD14 | — |
| Power Output | 402hp | 371hp | ▲ MT835C+31 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 928ci | 826ci | ▲ MT835C+102 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 5.2in | ▲ MT835C+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 6.8in | 6.5in | ▲ MT835C+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 270in | 313in | ▲ 9R 390+43 in · +16% |
| Width | 142in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 138in | 147in | ▲ 9R 390+9 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 50,000lb | 46,800lb | ▲ MT835C+3,200 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | Closed center pressure/flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Speed sensitive differential | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IVN | Category 4N | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Speed sensitive differential | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric, 12 volt | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 14.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | John Deere 9R 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 55th percentile (402 hp)B · 47th percentile (371 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 84th percentile (928 ci)B · 50th percentile (826 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 86th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 88th percentile (50,000 lb)B · 83rd percentile (46,800 lb)
A · MT835CB · 9R 390Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor