Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac
Agricultural
- power
- 535 hp
- displacement
- 912 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac vs Challenger MT865C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT865C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 534 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT865C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ STX530QT Quadtrac higher · +1 hp (<1%)STX530QT Quadtrac535 hp
MT865C534 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
STX530QT Quadtrac is in the 99th percentile; MT865C is in the 99th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT865C higher · +193 ci (+21%)STX530QT Quadtrac912 ci
MT865C1,105 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
STX530QT Quadtrac is in the 97th percentile; MT865C is in the 99th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSTX530QT Quadtrac6
MT865C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
STX530QT Quadtrac is in the 74th percentile; MT865C is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSTX530QT Quadtrac16
MT865C16
Median Agricultural Tractor16
STX530QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT865C is in the 50th · 972 models
STX530QT Quadtrac (A)MT865C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | STX530QT Quadtrac | MT865C | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | QSX15 | C18 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 535hp | 534hp | ▲ STX530QT Quadtrac+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 912ci | 1,105ci | ▲ MT865C+193 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 5.7in | ▲ MT865C+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 7.2in | ▲ MT865C+0.5 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Caterpillar Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 270in | — |
| Width | 36in | 142in | ▲ MT865C+106 in · +294% |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 52,410lb | 43,125lb | ▲ STX530QT Quadtrac+9,285 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensated | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4N | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Quad Track | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT865C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 99th percentile (535 hp)B · 99th percentile (534 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 97th percentile (912 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 99th percentile (52,410 lb)B · 98th percentile (43,125 lb)
A · STX530QT QuadtracB · MT865CMedian Agricultural Tractor