Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1038
Agricultural
- power
- 396 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1038 vs White Workhorse 145
WhiteModel B
White Workhorse 145
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 359 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger 1038
vs
WhiteWhite Workhorse 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 1038 higher · +399 ci (+111%)1038758 ci
Workhorse 145359 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1038 is in the 96th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 55th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10386
Workhorse 1456
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1038 is in the 74th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1038 higher · +16,950 lb (+116%)103831,615 lb
Workhorse 14514,665 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1038 is in the 95th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 68th · 971 models
Length
▲ 1038 higher · +67 in (+38%)1038242 in
Workhorse 145175 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
1038 is in the 95th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 52nd · 829 models
1038 (A)Workhorse 145 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | White | — |
| Model | 1038 | Workhorse 145 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | CDC-Cummins | — |
| Power Output | 396hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Workhorse 145+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 359ci | ▲ 1038+399 ci · +111% |
| Bore | 5in | 4in | ▲ 1038+1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 1038+1.8 in · +38% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 175in | ▲ 1038+67 in · +38% |
| Width | 108in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 130in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 14,665lb | ▲ 1038+16,950 lb · +116% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensing | closed center | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24V) | 12-volt | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 96th percentile (758 ci)B · 55th percentile (359 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 95th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 68th percentile (14,665 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 95th percentile (242 in)B · 52nd percentile (175 in)
A · 1038B · Workhorse 145Median Agricultural Tractor