Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1050
Row Crop
- power
- 485 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Challenger 1050 vs Challenger MT475D
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT475D
Row Crop
- power
- 123 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1050
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT475D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 1050 higher · +362 hp (+294%)1050485 hp
MT475D123 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
1050 is in the 99th percentile; MT475D is in the 41st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1050 higher · +459 ci (+154%)1050758 ci
MT475D299 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1050 is in the 99th percentile; MT475D is in the 31st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1050 higher · +2 (+50%)10506
MT475D4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1050 is in the 50th percentile; MT475D is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1050 higher · +15,850 lb (+101%)105031,615 lb
MT475D15,765 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1050 is in the 98th percentile; MT475D is in the 69th · 1,350 models
1050 (A)MT475D (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 1050 | MT475D | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 49AWI | — |
| Power Output | 485hp | 123hp | ▲ 1050+362 hp · +294% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT475D+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1050+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 758ci | 299ci | ▲ 1050+459 ci · +154% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ 1050+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 5.3in | ▲ 1050+1.2 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) with two mechanical ranges | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 108in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 105in | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 15,765lb | ▲ 1050+15,850 lb · +101% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensing | Direct engine drive | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO - Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/70R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 580/70R38 | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 52.8in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 52.8in | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 52.8" to 87.8" | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 52.8" to 87.8" | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type IV/IVN | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 4 | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4-Wheel Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Multiple wet disc, hydraulically operated | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 24V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | DOC, DPF, SCR | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 1050 | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab with air-conditioning | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 99th percentile (485 hp)B · 41st percentile (123 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 99th percentile (758 ci)B · 31st percentile (299 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 98th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 69th percentile (15,765 lb)
A · 1050B · MT475DMedian Row Crop Tractor