Head to head · Row Crop

Challenger 1050 vs Challenger MT655

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 1050

Row Crop

power
485 hp
displacement
758 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 1050 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT655

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full MT655 specs
ChallengerChallenger 1050
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT655

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 806–1,417

Engine Displacement

▲ 1050 higher · +245 ci (+48%)
1050758 ci
MT655513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

1050 is in the 99th percentile; MT655 is in the 92nd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
10506
MT6556
Median Row Crop Tractor6

1050 is in the 50th percentile; MT655 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ 1050 higher · +10,115 lb (+47%)
105031,615 lb
MT65521,500 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

1050 is in the 98th percentile; MT655 is in the 87th · 1,350 models

Length

▲ 1050 higher · +39 in (+19%)
1050242 in
MT655203 in
Median Row Crop Tractor180 in

1050 is in the 95th percentile; MT655 is in the 78th · 1,157 models

1050 (A)MT655 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model1050MT655—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
ManufacturerMANSisu—
Power Output485hpNot recorded—
Rated RPM1,700RPM2,200RPM▲ MT655+500 RPM · +29%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement758ci513ci▲ 1050+245 ci · +48%
Bore5in4.4in▲ 1050+0.6 in · +14%
Stroke6.5in5.7in▲ 1050+0.8 in · +14%

Transmission

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
TypeContinuously-variable transmissionPower shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
Length242in203in▲ 1050+39 in · +19%
Width108in98.2in▲ 1050+9.8 in · +10%
Height136in121in▲ 1050+15 in · +12%
Operating Weight31,615lb21,500lb▲ 1050+10,115 lb · +47%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
System TypeLoad-sensingClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC)—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
TypeRear PTO - IndependentNot recorded—
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
Hitch TypeType IV/IVNNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryCategory 4III—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4-Wheel Drive4WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
Battery Voltage24VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricElectric Start—

Emissions

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
StandardTier IVNot recorded—
Control SystemDOC, DPF, SCRNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger 1050Challenger MT655Difference
TypeCab with air-conditioningCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 99th percentile (758 ci)B · 92nd percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 98th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 87th percentile (21,500 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 95th percentile (242 in)B · 78th percentile (203 in)

Width

median 91.2 in
A · 94th percentile (108 in)B · 79th percentile (98.2 in)
A · 1050B · MT655Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 1050Full spec pageChallenger MT655