Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 35
Crawler
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 35 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 35
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +75 hp (+36%)35210 hp
65C285 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
35 is in the 52nd percentile; 65C is in the 64th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +235 ci (+58%)35403 ci
65C638 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
35 is in the 45th percentile; 65C is in the 70th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied356
65C6
Median Crawler Tractor6
35 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 35 higher · +6 (+60%)3516
65C10
Median Crawler Tractor10
35 is in the 69th percentile; 65C is in the 50th · 179 models
35 (A)65C (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 35 | 65C | — |
| Category | Crawler | Crawler | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3116 | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 210hp | 285hp | ▲ 65C+75 hp · +36% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+235 ci · +58% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.8in | ▲ 65C+0.7 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 5in | 6in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 211in | 232in | ▲ 65C+21 in · +10% |
| Width | 91in | 120in | ▲ 65C+29 in · +32% |
| Height | 125in | 128in | ▲ 65C+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 22,262lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 65C+10,613 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Variable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensated | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/II | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 35 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.6gal | 11gal | ▲ 65C+2.4 gal · +28% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 52nd percentile (210 hp)B · 64th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 45th percentile (403 ci)B · 70th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 69th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 49th percentile (22,262 lb)B · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · 35B · 65CMedian Crawler Tractor