ChallengerModel A
Challenger 55
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 442 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 55 vs Challenger 75E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 55
vs
ChallengerChallenger 75E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 75E higher · +187 ci (+42%)55442 ci
75E629 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
55 is in the 78th percentile; 75E is in the 93rd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied556
75E6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
55 is in the 74th percentile; 75E is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ 55 higher · +6 (+60%)5516
75E10
Median Agricultural Tractor16
55 is in the 50th percentile; 75E is in the 23rd · 972 models
Operating Weight
▲ 75E higher · +8,800 lb (+34%)5526,000 lb
75E34,800 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
55 is in the 93rd percentile; 75E is in the 97th · 971 models
55 (A)75E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 55 | 75E | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3126 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 340hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 442ci | 629ci | ▲ 75E+187 ci · +42% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.9in | ▲ 75E+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.5in | ▲ 75E+0.5 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 211in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 25in | — |
| Height | 125in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 26,000lb | 34,800lb | ▲ 75E+8,800 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Variable-Displacement Load-Sensing Pressure-Compensated | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III, IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.6gal | 15gal | ▲ 75E+6.4 gal · +74% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 78th percentile (442 ci)B · 93rd percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (26,000 lb)B · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)
A · 55B · 75EMedian Agricultural Tractor