ChallengerModel A
Challenger 55
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 442 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 55 vs Challenger 95E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 95E
Agricultural
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 55
vs
ChallengerChallenger 95E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 95E higher · +287 ci (+65%)55442 ci
95E729 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
55 is in the 78th percentile; 95E is in the 95th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied556
95E6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
55 is in the 74th percentile; 95E is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ 55 higher · +6 (+60%)5516
95E10
Median Agricultural Tractor16
55 is in the 50th percentile; 95E is in the 23rd · 972 models
Operating Weight
▲ 95E higher · +9,520 lb (+37%)5526,000 lb
95E35,520 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
55 is in the 93rd percentile; 95E is in the 97th · 971 models
55 (A)95E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 55 | 95E | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3126 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 410hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 442ci | 729ci | ▲ 95E+287 ci · +65% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 5.1in | ▲ 95E+0.8 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.9in | ▲ 95E+0.9 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 211in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 25in | — |
| Height | 125in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 26,000lb | 35,520lb | ▲ 95E+9,520 lb · +37% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Variable-Displacement Load-Sensing Pressure-Compensated | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Tracks | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic caliper disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.6gal | 20gal | ▲ 95E+11.4 gal · +133% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 78th percentile (442 ci)B · 95th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (26,000 lb)B · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)
A · 55B · 95EMedian Agricultural Tractor