ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65
Crawler
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 65 vs Fendt 927
FendtModel B
Fendt 927
Agricultural
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65
vs
FendtFendt 927
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tied65270 hp
927270 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
65 is in the 91st percentile; 927 is in the 91st · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65 higher · +202 ci (+46%)65638 ci
927436 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
65 is in the 94th percentile; 927 is in the 75th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied656
9276
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
65 is in the 74th percentile; 927 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65 higher · +10,977 lb (+49%)6533,200 lb
92722,223 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
65 is in the 96th percentile; 927 is in the 89th · 971 models
65 (A)927 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 65 | 927 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 270hp | 270hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 927+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 436ci | ▲ 65+202 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.4in | ▲ 65+0.6 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | stepless Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 225in | 223in | ▲ 65+2 in · <1% |
| Width | 113in | 82.7in | ▲ 65+30.3 in · +37% |
| Height | 127in | 131in | ▲ 927+4 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 33,200lb | 22,223lb | ▲ 65+10,977 lb · +49% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 91st percentile (270 hp)B · 91st percentile (270 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 94th percentile (638 ci)B · 75th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 96th percentile (33,200 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,223 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 92nd percentile (225 in)B · 90th percentile (223 in)
A · 65B · 927Median Agricultural Tractor