Head to head · Crawler

Challenger 65B vs Challenger MT765C

Challenger 65B Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 65B

Crawler

power
285 hp
displacement
638 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full 65B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
ChallengerChallenger 65B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler

n = 142–192

Engine Power

▲ MT765C higher · +36 hp (+13%)
65B285 hp
MT765C321 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp

65B is in the 64th percentile; MT765C is in the 66th · 142 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 65B higher · +101 ci (+19%)
65B638 ci
MT765C537 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci

65B is in the 70th percentile; MT765C is in the 59th · 191 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
65B6
MT765C6
Median Crawler Tractor6

65B is in the 50th percentile; MT765C is in the 50th · 192 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT765C higher · +6 (+60%)
65B10
MT765C16
Median Crawler Tractor10

65B is in the 50th percentile; MT765C is in the 69th · 179 models

65B (A)MT765C (B)Median Crawler Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model65BMT765C—
CategoryCrawlerCrawler, Agricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelNot recordedC9 ACERT—
Power Output285hp321hp▲ MT765C+36 hp · +13%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement638ci537ci▲ 65B+101 ci · +19%
Bore4.8in4.4in▲ 65B+0.4 in · +9%
Stroke6in5.9in▲ 65B+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeFull Power Shift16-Speed Full Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
Length107in233in▲ MT765C+126 in · +118%
Width24.5in133in▲ MT765C+109 in · +443%
HeightNot recorded136in—
Operating Weight34,030lb31,085lb▲ 65B+2,945 lb · +9%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
System TypeClosedClosed center pressure-flow compensated—
Steering TypeHydrostatic Differential SteeringElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIII/IVCategory III/IIIN—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
Chassis TypeNot recordedCrawler—
Steering TypeHydrostatic Differential SteeringElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic Wet Disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
Coolant11galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger 65BChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 200 hp
A · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 66th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 468 ci
A · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 59th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 10
A · 50th percentile (10)B · 69th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 23,320 lb
A · 71st percentile (34,030 lb)B · 66th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 65BB · MT765CMedian Crawler Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 65BFull spec pageChallenger MT765C