ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65B
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65B vs Challenger MT835
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT835
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 65B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ MT835 higher · +55 hp (+19%)65B285 hp
MT835340 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65B is in the 64th percentile; MT835 is in the 70th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT835 higher · +91 ci (+14%)65B638 ci
MT835729 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65B is in the 70th percentile; MT835 is in the 75th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65B6
MT8356
Median Crawler Tractor6
65B is in the 50th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT835 higher · +6 (+60%)65B10
MT83516
Median Crawler Tractor10
65B is in the 50th percentile; MT835 is in the 69th · 179 models
65B (A)MT835 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65B | MT835 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | C12 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 340hp | ▲ MT835+55 hp · +19% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 729ci | ▲ MT835+91 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 5.1in | ▲ MT835+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.9in | ▲ 65B+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 266in | ▲ MT835+159 in · +149% |
| Width | 24.5in | 142in | ▲ MT835+118 in · +480% |
| Height | Not recorded | 139in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,030lb | 40,000lb | ▲ MT835+5,970 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Type IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 70th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 75th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 69th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 71st percentile (34,030 lb)B · 79th percentile (40,000 lb)
A · 65BB · MT835Median Crawler Tractor