Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT835
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT835 vs John Deere 9400T
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9400T
Crawler
- power
- 347 hp
- displacement
- 765 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT835
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9400T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 9400T higher · +7 hp (+2%)MT835340 hp
9400T347 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT835 is in the 96th percentile; 9400T is in the 96th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9400T higher · +36 ci (+5%)MT835729 ci
9400T765 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT835 is in the 95th percentile; 9400T is in the 96th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT8356
9400T6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT835 is in the 74th percentile; 9400T is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9400T higher · +8 (+50%)MT83516
9400T24
Median Agricultural Tractor16
MT835 is in the 50th percentile; 9400T is in the 81st · 972 models
MT835 (A)9400T (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT835 | 9400T | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | C12 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | 347hp | ▲ 9400T+7 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 729ci | 765ci | ▲ 9400T+36 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 5in | ▲ MT835+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 6.5in | ▲ 9400T+0.6 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 142in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 139in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 40,000lb | 42,620lb | ▲ 9400T+2,620 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type IVN | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT835 | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (340 hp)B · 96th percentile (347 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 95th percentile (729 ci)B · 96th percentile (765 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 81st percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (40,000 lb)B · 98th percentile (42,620 lb)
A · MT835B · 9400TMedian Agricultural Tractor