ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Challenger MT738
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT738
Crawler
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT738
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ MT738 higher · +40 hp (+14%)65C285 hp
MT738325 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; MT738 is in the 67th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +39 ci (+7%)65C638 ci
MT738599 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; MT738 is in the 66th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ MT738 higher · +1 (+17%)65C6
MT7387
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; MT738 is in the 97th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT738 higher · +3,175 lb (+10%)65C32,875 lb
MT73836,050 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; MT738 is in the 77th · 173 models
65C (A)MT738 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65C | MT738 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Crawler | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Power | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 325hp | ▲ MT738+40 hp · +14% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,701RPM | ▲ 65C+399 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT738+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 599ci | ▲ 65C+39 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ 65C+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT, infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 36,050lb | ▲ MT738+3,175 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Load sensing | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 67th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 66th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 77th percentile (36,050 lb)
A · 65CB · MT738Median Crawler Tractor