ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Cockshutt 1655
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1655
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 283 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1655
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +355 ci (+125%)65C638 ci
1655283 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 1655 is in the 39th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
16556
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 1655 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1655 higher · +8 (+80%)65C10
165518
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 1655 is in the 87th · 179 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +24,875 lb (+311%)65C32,875 lb
16558,000 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; 1655 is in the 28th · 173 models
65C (A)1655 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | 65C | 1655 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Waukesha-Oliver | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 4.6L 6-cyl diesel | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1655+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 283ci | ▲ 65C+355 ci · +125% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4in | ▲ 65C+2 in · +50% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | 81.5in | ▲ 65C+38.5 in · +47% |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 8,000lb | ▲ 65C+24,875 lb · +311% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1655 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 5gal | ▲ 65C+6 gal · +120% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 39th percentile (283 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 87th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 28th percentile (8,000 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 88th percentile (120 in)B · 51st percentile (81.5 in)
A · 65CB · 1655Median Crawler Tractor