ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Ebro 160E
Image not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
EbroEbro 160E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +224 hp (+367%)65C285 hp
160E61 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 160E is in the 38th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +418 ci (+190%)65C638 ci
160E220 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 160E is in the 30th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
160E4
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 160E is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +4 (+67%)65C10
160E6
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 160E is in the 34th · 179 models
65C (A)160E (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ebro | — |
| Model | 65C | 160E | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Ebro | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 61hp | ▲ 65C+224 hp · +367% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 220ci | ▲ 65C+418 ci · +190% |
| Bore | 4.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 131in | ▲ 65C+101 in · +77% |
| Width | 120in | 79.5in | ▲ 65C+40.5 in · +51% |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 5,291lb | ▲ 65C+27,584 lb · +521% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ebro 160E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 4gal | ▲ 65C+7 gal · +175% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 38th percentile (61 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 30th percentile (220 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 34th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 17th percentile (5,291 lb)
A · 65CB · 160EMedian Crawler Tractor