ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Fendt 314 Vario
FendtModel B
Fendt 314 Vario
Utility
- power
- 130 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
FendtFendt 314 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +155 hp (+119%)65C285 hp
314 Vario130 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 314 Vario is in the 48th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +370 ci (+138%)65C638 ci
314 Vario268 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 314 Vario is in the 36th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
314 Vario4
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 314 Vario is in the 33rd · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +21,830 lb (+198%)65C32,875 lb
314 Vario11,045 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; 314 Vario is in the 35th · 173 models
65C (A)314 Vario (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 65C | 314 Vario | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 130hp | ▲ 65C+155 hp · +119% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 268ci | ▲ 65C+370 ci · +138% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.3in | ▲ 65C+0.5 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.7in | ▲ 65C+1.3 in · +28% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 171in | ▲ 65C+61 in · +36% |
| Width | 120in | 91.3in | ▲ 65C+28.7 in · +31% |
| Height | 128in | 113in | ▲ 65C+15 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 11,045lb | ▲ 65C+21,830 lb · +198% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/65R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 540/65R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 18,739lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 314 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 48th percentile (130 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 36th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 35th percentile (11,045 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 59th percentile (171 in)
A · 65CB · 314 VarioMedian Crawler Tractor