ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Fendt 936 Vario
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 936 Vario
Row Crop
- power
- 355 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
FendtFendt 936 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 936 Vario higher · +70 hp (+25%)65C285 hp
936 Vario355 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 936 Vario is in the 72nd · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +202 ci (+46%)65C638 ci
936 Vario436 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 936 Vario is in the 49th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
936 Vario6
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 936 Vario is in the 50th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +10,035 lb (+44%)65C32,875 lb
936 Vario22,840 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; 936 Vario is in the 50th · 173 models
65C (A)936 Vario (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 65C | 936 Vario | — |
| Category | Crawler | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Deutz | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 2013 L06 4V | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 355hp | ▲ 936 Vario+70 hp · +25% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 936 Vario+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 436ci | ▲ 65C+202 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.3in | ▲ 65C+0.5 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.1in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 223in | ▲ 65C+9 in · +4% |
| Width | 120in | 108in | ▲ 65C+12 in · +11% |
| Height | 128in | 131in | ▲ 936 Vario+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 22,840lb | ▲ 65C+10,035 lb · +44% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type IV | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 33,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 936 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 72nd percentile (355 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 49th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 50th percentile (22,840 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 79th percentile (223 in)
A · 65CB · 936 VarioMedian Crawler Tractor