ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Fendt 940 Vario MT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 940 Vario MT
Crawler
- power
- 400 hp
- displacement
- 598 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
FendtFendt 940 Vario MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +115 hp (+40%)65C285 hp
940 Vario MT400 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 75th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +40 ci (+7%)65C638 ci
940 Vario MT598 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 65th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +1 (+17%)65C6
940 Vario MT7
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 97th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +568 lb (+2%)65C32,875 lb
940 Vario MT33,443 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 69th · 173 models
65C (A)940 Vario MT (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 65C | 940 Vario MT | — |
| Category | Crawler | Crawler | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 400hp | ▲ 940 Vario MT+115 hp · +40% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,450RPM | ▲ 65C+650 RPM · +45% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ 940 Vario MT+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 598ci | ▲ 65C+40 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ 65C+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 241in | ▲ 940 Vario MT+9 in · +4% |
| Width | 120in | 98.5in | ▲ 65C+21.5 in · +22% |
| Height | 128in | 138in | ▲ 940 Vario MT+10 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 33,443lb | ▲ 940 Vario MT+568 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed center | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 41,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track Drive | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 75th percentile (400 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 65th percentile (598 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 69th percentile (33,443 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 93rd percentile (241 in)
A · 65CB · 940 Vario MTMedian Crawler Tractor