ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Landini 6000
Image not recorded
LandiniModel B
Landini 6000
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
LandiniLandini 6000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +223 hp (+360%)65C285 hp
600062 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 6000 is in the 38th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +435 ci (+214%)65C638 ci
6000203 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 6000 is in the 29th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
60004
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 6000 is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6000 higher · +2 (+20%)65C10
600012
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 6000 is in the 54th · 179 models
65C (A)6000 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Landini | — |
| Model | 65C | 6000 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | A4.203 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 62hp | ▲ 65C+223 hp · +360% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 65C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 203ci | ▲ 65C+435 ci · +214% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.6in | ▲ 65C+1.2 in · +33% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 132in | ▲ 65C+100 in · +76% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 55.5in | ▲ 65C+72.5 in · +131% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 85in | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 38th percentile (62 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 29th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 41st percentile (132 in)
A · 65CB · 6000Median Crawler Tractor