ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Massey Ferguson 1114
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1114
Row Crop
- power
- 110 hp
- displacement
- 354 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1114
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +175 hp (+159%)65C285 hp
1114110 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 1114 is in the 46th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +284 ci (+80%)65C638 ci
1114354 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 1114 is in the 44th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
11146
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 1114 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1114 higher · +2 (+20%)65C10
111412
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 1114 is in the 54th · 179 models
65C (A)1114 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 65C | 1114 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | A6.354 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 110hp | ▲ 65C+175 hp · +159% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 1114+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 354ci | ▲ 65C+284 ci · +80% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 185in | ▲ 65C+47 in · +25% |
| Width | 120in | 95in | ▲ 65C+25 in · +26% |
| Height | 128in | 114in | ▲ 65C+14 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 10,694lb | ▲ 65C+22,181 lb · +207% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power steering | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 1114 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 46th percentile (110 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 44th percentile (354 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 34th percentile (10,694 lb)
A · 65CB · 1114Median Crawler Tractor