ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs McCormick Intl CX50
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CX50
Utility
- power
- 53 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +232 hp (+438%)65C285 hp
CX5053 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; CX50 is in the 31st · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +473 ci (+287%)65C638 ci
CX50165 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; CX50 is in the 23rd · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +3 (+100%)65C6
CX503
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; CX50 is in the 10th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ CX50 higher · +6 (+60%)65C10
CX5016
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; CX50 is in the 69th · 179 models
65C (A)CX50 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 65C | CX50 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 53hp | ▲ 65C+232 hp · +438% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ CX50+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ 65C+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 165ci | ▲ 65C+473 ci · +287% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.7in | ▲ 65C+1.1 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Synch shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 160in | ▲ 65C+72 in · +45% |
| Width | 120in | 77.3in | ▲ 65C+42.7 in · +55% |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 7,132lb | ▲ 65C+25,743 lb · +361% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 31st percentile (53 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 23rd percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 10th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 69th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 27th percentile (7,132 lb)
A · 65CB · CX50Median Crawler Tractor