ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs McCormick Intl MC80
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl MC80
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl MC80
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +201 hp (+239%)65C285 hp
MC8084 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; MC80 is in the 44th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +394 ci (+161%)65C638 ci
MC80244 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; MC80 is in the 34th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
MC804
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; MC80 is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ MC80 higher · +22 (+220%)65C10
MC8032
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; MC80 is in the 99th · 179 models
65C (A)MC80 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 65C | MC80 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 84hp | ▲ 65C+201 hp · +239% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MC80+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 244ci | ▲ 65C+394 ci · +161% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 175in | ▲ 65C+57 in · +33% |
| Width | 120in | 84.6in | ▲ 65C+35.4 in · +42% |
| Height | 128in | 108in | ▲ 65C+20 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 9,921lb | ▲ 65C+22,954 lb · +231% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Axial piston pump | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MC80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 44th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 34th percentile (244 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 99th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 32nd percentile (9,921 lb)
A · 65CB · MC80Median Crawler Tractor