ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Minneapolis-Moline V
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline V
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 64.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline V
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +573 ci (+883%)65C638 ci
V64.9 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; V is in the 1st · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
V4
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; V is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +7 (+233%)65C10
V3
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; V is in the 8th · 179 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +31,165 lb (+1823%)65C32,875 lb
V1,710 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; V is in the 1st · 173 models
65C (A)V (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 65C | V | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Hercules | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | ZXB-3 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 65C+300 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 64.9ci | ▲ 65C+573 ci · +883% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 2.6in | ▲ 65C+2.2 in · +85% |
| Stroke | 6in | 3in | ▲ 65C+3 in · +100% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 105in | ▲ 65C+127 in · +121% |
| Width | 120in | 51in | ▲ 65C+69 in · +135% |
| Height | 128in | 61.3in | ▲ 65C+66.7 in · +109% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 1,710lb | ▲ 65C+31,165 lb · +1823% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Manual | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Minneapolis-Moline V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 1.5gal | ▲ 65C+9.5 gal · +633% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 1st percentile (64.9 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 8th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 1st percentile (1,710 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 10th percentile (105 in)
A · 65CB · VMedian Crawler Tractor