ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Mitsubishi R2000
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi R2000
Sub-Compact
- power
- 19.7 hp
- displacement
- 60.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi R2000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +265 hp (+1347%)65C285 hp
R200019.7 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; R2000 is in the 2nd · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +577 ci (+953%)65C638 ci
R200060.6 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; R2000 is in the 1st · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +4 (+200%)65C6
R20002
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; R2000 is in the 1st · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +4 (+67%)65C10
R20006
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; R2000 is in the 34th · 179 models
65C (A)R2000 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 65C | R2000 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 2DQ | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 19.7hp | ▲ 65C+265 hp · +1347% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ R2000+600 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 2 | ▲ 65C+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 60.6ci | ▲ 65C+577 ci · +953% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.2in | ▲ 65C+1.6 in · +50% |
| Stroke | 6in | 3.7in | ▲ 65C+2.3 in · +62% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 92.1in | ▲ 65C+140 in · +152% |
| Width | 120in | 54.5in | ▲ 65C+65.5 in · +120% |
| Height | 128in | 52in | ▲ 65C+76 in · +146% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 1,786lb | ▲ 65C+31,089 lb · +1741% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 2nd percentile (19.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 1st percentile (60.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 34th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 1st percentile (1,786 lb)
A · 65CB · R2000Median Crawler Tractor