ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs New Holland TM120
New HollandModel B
New Holland TM120
Row Crop
- power
- 120 hp
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 17
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
New HollandNew Holland TM120
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +165 hp (+138%)65C285 hp
TM120120 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; TM120 is in the 47th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +182 ci (+40%)65C638 ci
TM120456 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; TM120 is in the 49th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
TM1206
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; TM120 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ TM120 higher · +7 (+70%)65C10
TM12017
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; TM120 is in the 82nd · 179 models
65C (A)TM120 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | 65C | TM120 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | New Holland | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 120hp | ▲ 65C+165 hp · +138% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ TM120+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 456ci | ▲ 65C+182 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 186in | ▲ 65C+46 in · +25% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 111in | ▲ 65C+17 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 11,830lb | ▲ 65C+21,045 lb · +178% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | New Holland TM120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 6.7gal | ▲ 65C+4.3 gal · +64% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 47th percentile (120 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 49th percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 82nd percentile (17)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 39th percentile (11,830 lb)
A · 65CB · TM120Median Crawler Tractor