ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Renault 155-54
RenaultModel B
Renault 155-54
Row Crop
- power
- 145 hp
- displacement
- 380 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
RenaultRenault 155-54
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +140 hp (+97%)65C285 hp
155-54145 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 155-54 is in the 49th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +258 ci (+68%)65C638 ci
155-54380 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 155-54 is in the 45th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
155-546
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 155-54 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 155-54 higher · +14 (+140%)65C10
155-5424
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 155-54 is in the 94th · 179 models
65C (A)155-54 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Renault | — |
| Model | 65C | 155-54 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | MWM | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | TD226-B6 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 145hp | ▲ 65C+140 hp · +97% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ 155-54+250 RPM · +12% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 380ci | ▲ 65C+258 ci · +68% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.1in | ▲ 65C+0.7 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.7in | ▲ 65C+1.3 in · +28% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 181in | ▲ 65C+51 in · +28% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 125in | ▲ 65C+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 12,403lb | ▲ 65C+20,472 lb · +165% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20.8-38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Renault 155-54 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 49th percentile (145 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 45th percentile (380 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 94th percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 40th percentile (12,403 lb)
A · 65CB · 155-54Median Crawler Tractor