ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Steyr 185
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr 185
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
SteyrSteyr 185
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +394 ci (+161%)65C638 ci
185244 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 185 is in the 34th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +3 (+100%)65C6
1853
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 185 is in the 10th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +4 (+67%)65C10
1856
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 185 is in the 34th · 179 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +26,923 lb (+452%)65C32,875 lb
1855,952 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; 185 is in the 23rd · 173 models
65C (A)185 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Steyr | — |
| Model | 65C | 185 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Steyr | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | WD 313 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,600RPM | ▲ 65C+500 RPM · +31% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ 65C+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 244ci | ▲ 65C+394 ci · +161% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.3in | ▲ 65C+0.5 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.5in | ▲ 65C+0.5 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 131in | ▲ 65C+101 in · +77% |
| Width | 120in | 73.4in | ▲ 65C+46.6 in · +63% |
| Height | 128in | 85.8in | ▲ 65C+42.2 in · +49% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 5,952lb | ▲ 65C+26,923 lb · +452% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 34th percentile (244 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 10th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 34th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 23rd percentile (5,952 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 39th percentile (131 in)
A · 65CB · 185Median Crawler Tractor