ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs White 2-105
WhiteModel B
White 2-105
Row Crop
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 354 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
WhiteWhite 2-105
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +180 hp (+171%)65C285 hp
2-105105 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 2-105 is in the 46th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +284 ci (+80%)65C638 ci
2-105354 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 2-105 is in the 44th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
2-1056
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 2-105 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2-105 higher · +8 (+80%)65C10
2-10518
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 2-105 is in the 87th · 179 models
65C (A)2-105 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | White | — |
| Model | 65C | 2-105 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Perkins | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 105hp | ▲ 65C+180 hp · +171% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 2-105+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 354ci | ▲ 65C+284 ci · +80% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 178in | ▲ 65C+54 in · +30% |
| Width | 120in | 80.6in | ▲ 65C+39.4 in · +49% |
| Height | 128in | 85.5in | ▲ 65C+42.5 in · +50% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 11,810lb | ▲ 65C+21,065 lb · +178% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Independent hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 6gal | ▲ 65C+5 gal · +83% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | White 2-105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab optional with heat and A/C | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 46th percentile (105 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 44th percentile (354 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 87th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 39th percentile (11,810 lb)
A · 65CB · 2-105Median Crawler Tractor