ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65E
Articulated
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 65E vs Challenger MT765B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765B
Articulated
- power
- 321 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 65E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT765B higher · +11 hp (+4%)65E310 hp
MT765B321 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
65E is in the 9th percentile; MT765B is in the 10th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65E higher · +92 ci (+17%)65E629 ci
MT765B537 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
65E is in the 13th percentile; MT765B is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65E6
MT765B6
Median Articulated Tractor6
65E is in the 50th percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT765B higher · +6 (+60%)65E10
MT765B16
Median Articulated Tractor16
65E is in the 3rd percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 59 models
65E (A)MT765B (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65E | MT765B | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | C9 ACERT Tech Tier 3 | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 321hp | ▲ MT765B+11 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 537ci | ▲ 65E+92 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 65E+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.9in | ▲ MT765B+0.4 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | PowerShift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 233in | — |
| Width | 25in | 88in | ▲ MT765B+63 in · +252% |
| Height | Not recorded | 136in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,195lb | 31,085lb | ▲ 65E+3,110 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed-center PFC | — |
| Steering Type | hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear | Standard Cat.3/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 17,263lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 9th percentile (310 hp)B · 10th percentile (321 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 1st percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 9th percentile (34,195 lb)B · 4th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 65EB · MT765BMedian Articulated Tractor