Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 75 vs Challenger MT765B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765B
Articulated
- power
- 321 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 75
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 75 higher · +4 hp (+1%)75325 hp
MT765B321 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
75 is in the 13th percentile; MT765B is in the 10th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75 higher · +92 ci (+17%)75629 ci
MT765B537 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
75 is in the 13th percentile; MT765B is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied756
MT765B6
Median Articulated Tractor6
75 is in the 50th percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT765B higher · +6 (+60%)7510
MT765B16
Median Articulated Tractor16
75 is in the 3rd percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 59 models
75 (A)MT765B (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75 | MT765B | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | C9 ACERT Tech Tier 3 | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 321hp | ▲ 75+4 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 537ci | ▲ 75+92 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 75+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.9in | ▲ MT765B+0.4 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | PowerShift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 233in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 88in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 136in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,370lb | 31,085lb | ▲ 75+3,285 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed-center PFC | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Standard Cat.3/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 17,263lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 13th percentile (325 hp)B · 10th percentile (321 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 1st percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 13th percentile (34,370 lb)B · 4th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 75B · MT765BMedian Articulated Tractor