Head to head · Articulated

Challenger 75C vs Challenger MT765B

Challenger 75C Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 75C

Articulated

power
325 hp
displacement
629 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full 75C specs
Challenger MT765B Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765B

Articulated

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765B specs
ChallengerChallenger 75C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated

n = 41–62

Engine Power

▲ 75C higher · +4 hp (+1%)
75C325 hp
MT765B321 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp

75C is in the 13th percentile; MT765B is in the 10th · 62 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 75C higher · +92 ci (+17%)
75C629 ci
MT765B537 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci

75C is in the 13th percentile; MT765B is in the 1st · 61 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
75C6
MT765B6
Median Articulated Tractor6

75C is in the 50th percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 61 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT765B higher · +6 (+60%)
75C10
MT765B16
Median Articulated Tractor16

75C is in the 3rd percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 59 models

75C (A)MT765B (B)Median Articulated Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model75CMT765B—
CategoryArticulatedArticulatedSame

Engine

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
Model3176 ATAACC9 ACERT Tech Tier 3—
Power Output325hp321hp▲ 75C+4 hp · +1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement629ci537ci▲ 75C+92 ci · +17%
Bore4.9in4.4in▲ 75C+0.5 in · +11%
Stroke5.5in5.9in▲ MT765B+0.4 in · +7%

Transmission

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
TypeFull Power ShiftPowerShift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
Length232in233in▲ MT765B+1 in · <1%
Width120in88in▲ 75C+32 in · +36%
Height144in136in▲ 75C+8 in · +6%
Operating Weight33,305lb31,085lb▲ 75C+2,220 lb · +7%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
System TypeClosed CenterClosed-center PFC—
Steering TypeHydraulicNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
TypeRear 1000Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
Hitch TypeNot recordedStandard Cat.3/3N—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch CapacityNot recorded17,263lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
Chassis TypeNot recordedTracklayer-rubber tracked—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypeHydraulicNot recorded—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet Disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
Coolant15galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger 75CChallenger MT765BDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 450 hp
A · 13th percentile (325 hp)B · 10th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 827 ci
A · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 1st percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 51,335 lb
A · 8th percentile (33,305 lb)B · 4th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 75CB · MT765BMedian Articulated Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 75CFull spec pageChallenger MT765B