ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75C
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 75C vs Honda H6522
Image not recorded
HondaModel B
Honda H6522
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 75.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
ChallengerChallenger 75C
vs
HondaHonda H6522
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 75C higher · +303 hp (+1377%)75C325 hp
H652222 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
75C is in the 13th percentile; H6522 is in the 1st · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75C higher · +554 ci (+734%)75C629 ci
H652275.4 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
75C is in the 13th percentile; H6522 is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ 75C higher · +3 (+100%)75C6
H65223
Median Articulated Tractor6
75C is in the 50th percentile; H6522 is in the 1st · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ 75C higher · +1 (+11%)75C10
H65229
Median Articulated Tractor16
75C is in the 3rd percentile; H6522 is in the 1st · 59 models
75C (A)H6522 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Honda | — |
| Model | 75C | H6522 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Honda | — |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | GD1250 | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 22hp | ▲ 75C+303 hp · +1377% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ H6522+900 RPM · +43% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ 75C+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 629ci | 75.4ci | ▲ 75C+554 ci · +734% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 3.2in | ▲ 75C+1.7 in · +53% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 3.1in | ▲ 75C+2.4 in · +77% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Gear type | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 102in | ▲ 75C+130 in · +127% |
| Width | 120in | 48.8in | ▲ 75C+71.2 in · +146% |
| Height | 144in | 73.6in | ▲ 75C+70.4 in · +96% |
| Operating Weight | 33,305lb | 1,645lb | ▲ 75C+31,660 lb · +1925% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power assist | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear 1000 | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 750lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power assist | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Mechanical wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 1.2gal | ▲ 75C+13.9 gal · +1264% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Honda H6522 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 13th percentile (325 hp)B · 1st percentile (22 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 1st percentile (75.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 1st percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 8th percentile (33,305 lb)B · 1st percentile (1,645 lb)
A · 75CB · H6522Median Articulated Tractor