Head to head · Articulated

Challenger 75D vs Challenger MT765B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 75D

Articulated

power
330 hp
displacement
629 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full 75D specs
Challenger MT765B Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765B

Articulated

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765B specs
ChallengerChallenger 75D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated

n = 41–62

Engine Power

▲ 75D higher · +9 hp (+3%)
75D330 hp
MT765B321 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp

75D is in the 15th percentile; MT765B is in the 10th · 62 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 75D higher · +92 ci (+17%)
75D629 ci
MT765B537 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci

75D is in the 13th percentile; MT765B is in the 1st · 61 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
75D6
MT765B6
Median Articulated Tractor6

75D is in the 50th percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 61 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT765B higher · +6 (+60%)
75D10
MT765B16
Median Articulated Tractor16

75D is in the 3rd percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 59 models

75D (A)MT765B (B)Median Articulated Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model75DMT765B—
CategoryArticulatedArticulatedSame

Engine

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
Model3176C ATAACC9 ACERT Tech Tier 3—
Power Output330hp321hp▲ 75D+9 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement629ci537ci▲ 75D+92 ci · +17%
Bore4.9in4.4in▲ 75D+0.5 in · +11%
Stroke5.5in5.9in▲ MT765B+0.4 in · +7%

Transmission

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
TypeFull power shiftPowerShift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
Length232in233in▲ MT765B+1 in · <1%
Width120in88in▲ 75D+32 in · +36%
Height128in136in▲ MT765B+8 in · +6%
Operating Weight35,720lb31,085lb▲ 75D+4,635 lb · +15%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
System TypeClosed-center pressure-compensatedClosed-center PFC—
Steering TypeHydrostatic differentialNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
Type1000 (1.75)Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
Hitch TypeNot recordedStandard Cat.3/3N—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch CapacityNot recorded17,263lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
Chassis TypeNot recordedTracklayer-rubber tracked—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet Disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
Starter TypeElectric StarterElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
Coolant15galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger 75DChallenger MT765BDifference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 450 hp
A · 15th percentile (330 hp)B · 10th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 827 ci
A · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 1st percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 51,335 lb
A · 17th percentile (35,720 lb)B · 4th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 75DB · MT765BMedian Articulated Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 75DFull spec pageChallenger MT765B