Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75D
Articulated
- power
- 330 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 75D vs Yanmar LX490
YanmarModel B
Yanmar LX490
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48.5 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 75D
vs
YanmarYanmar LX490
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 75D higher · +282 hp (+580%)75D330 hp
LX49048.5 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
75D is in the 15th percentile; LX490 is in the 1st · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75D higher · +507 ci (+416%)75D629 ci
LX490122 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
75D is in the 13th percentile; LX490 is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ 75D higher · +2 (+50%)75D6
LX4904
Median Articulated Tractor6
75D is in the 50th percentile; LX490 is in the 1st · 61 models
Operating Weight
▲ 75D higher · +32,102 lb (+887%)75D35,720 lb
LX4903,618 lb
Median Articulated Tractor51,335 lb
75D is in the 17th percentile; LX490 is in the 1st · 57 models
75D (A)LX490 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 75D | LX490 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 3176C ATAAC | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 330hp | 48.5hp | ▲ 75D+282 hp · +580% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ LX490+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 75D+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 629ci | 122ci | ▲ 75D+507 ci · +416% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 3.5in | ▲ 75D+1.4 in · +40% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 3.6in | ▲ 75D+1.9 in · +53% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 124in | ▲ 75D+108 in · +87% |
| Width | 120in | 83.4in | ▲ 75D+36.6 in · +44% |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,720lb | 3,618lb | ▲ 75D+32,102 lb · +887% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center pressure-compensated | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 1000 (1.75) | Electro-hydraulic independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,760lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75D | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 1.5gal | ▲ 75D+13.5 gal · +900% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 15th percentile (330 hp)B · 1st percentile (48.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 1st percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 17th percentile (35,720 lb)B · 1st percentile (3,618 lb)
Width
median 100 inA · 72nd percentile (120 in)B · 38th percentile (83.4 in)
A · 75DB · LX490Median Articulated Tractor