ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT675D
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT675D
Agricultural
- power
- 328 hp
- displacement
- 514 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT675D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 75E higher · +12 hp (+4%)75E340 hp
MT675D328 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
75E is in the 96th percentile; MT675D is in the 95th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75E higher · +115 ci (+22%)75E629 ci
MT675D514 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
75E is in the 93rd percentile; MT675D is in the 88th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75E6
MT675D6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
75E is in the 74th percentile; MT675D is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 75E higher · +9,435 lb (+37%)75E34,800 lb
MT675D25,365 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
75E is in the 97th percentile; MT675D is in the 92nd · 971 models
75E (A)MT675D (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75E | MT675D | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Sisu Diesel (AGCO Power) | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | 328hp | ▲ 75E+12 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 514ci | ▲ 75E+115 ci · +22% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 75E+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.7in | ▲ MT675D+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 216in | — |
| Width | 25in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 141in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,800lb | 25,365lb | ▲ 75E+9,435 lb · +37% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/80R46 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/80R46 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category III Quick Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4-Wheel drive | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12V Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT675D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (340 hp)B · 95th percentile (328 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 88th percentile (514 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 92nd percentile (25,365 lb)
A · 75EB · MT675DMedian Agricultural Tractor