Head to head · Crawler

Challenger 85E vs Challenger MT765C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 85E

Crawler

power
375 hp
displacement
729 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full 85E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
ChallengerChallenger 85E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler

n = 142–192

Engine Power

▲ 85E higher · +54 hp (+17%)
85E375 hp
MT765C321 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp

85E is in the 74th percentile; MT765C is in the 66th · 142 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 85E higher · +192 ci (+36%)
85E729 ci
MT765C537 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci

85E is in the 75th percentile; MT765C is in the 59th · 191 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
85E6
MT765C6
Median Crawler Tractor6

85E is in the 50th percentile; MT765C is in the 50th · 192 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT765C higher · +6 (+60%)
85E10
MT765C16
Median Crawler Tractor10

85E is in the 50th percentile; MT765C is in the 69th · 179 models

85E (A)MT765C (B)Median Crawler Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model85EMT765C—
CategoryCrawlerCrawler, Agricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelNot recordedC9 ACERT—
Power Output375hp321hp▲ 85E+54 hp · +17%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement729ci537ci▲ 85E+192 ci · +36%
Bore5.1in4.4in▲ 85E+0.7 in · +16%
Stroke5.9in5.9inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeFull Power Shift16-Speed Full Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
LengthNot recorded233in—
Width25in133in▲ MT765C+108 in · +432%
HeightNot recorded136in—
Operating Weight34,895lb31,085lb▲ 85E+3,810 lb · +12%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
System TypeClosedClosed center pressure-flow compensated—
Steering TypeHydrostatic Differential SteeringElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory III/IIIN—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
Chassis TypeNot recordedCrawler—
Steering TypeHydrostatic Differential SteeringElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic Wet Disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
Coolant20galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger 85EChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 200 hp
A · 74th percentile (375 hp)B · 66th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 468 ci
A · 75th percentile (729 ci)B · 59th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 10
A · 50th percentile (10)B · 69th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 23,320 lb
A · 73rd percentile (34,895 lb)B · 66th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 85EB · MT765CMedian Crawler Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 85EFull spec pageChallenger MT765C