Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger 95E vs Challenger MT875B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 95E

Agricultural

power
410 hp
displacement
729 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full 95E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT875B

Agricultural

power
431 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT875B specs
ChallengerChallenger 95E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT875B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT875B higher · +21 hp (+5%)
95E410 hp
MT875B431 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

95E is in the 97th percentile; MT875B is in the 98th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT875B higher · +376 ci (+52%)
95E729 ci
MT875B1,105 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

95E is in the 95th percentile; MT875B is in the 99th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
95E6
MT875B6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

95E is in the 74th percentile; MT875B is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT875B higher · +6 (+60%)
95E10
MT875B16
Median Agricultural Tractor16

95E is in the 23rd percentile; MT875B is in the 50th · 972 models

95E (A)MT875B (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model95EMT875B—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelNot recordedC18—
Power Output410hp431hp▲ MT875B+21 hp · +5%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement729ci1,105ci▲ MT875B+376 ci · +52%
Bore5.1in5.7in▲ MT875B+0.6 in · +12%
Stroke5.9in7.2in▲ MT875B+1.3 in · +22%

Transmission

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
TypeFull power shiftCat Powershift (Full Power Shift)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
LengthNot recorded266in—
Width25in141in▲ MT875B+116 in · +464%
HeightNot recorded138in—
Operating Weight35,520lb43,700lb▲ MT875B+8,180 lb · +23%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
System TypeClosed centerClosed Center PFC—
Steering TypeHydrostatic differential steeringNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
Hitch TypeNot recordedNo 3-point hitch available—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—
Drive TypeTracksNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic differential steeringNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic caliper discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter (12V)—

Capacities

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
Coolant20galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger 95EChallenger MT875BDifference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 97th percentile (410 hp)B · 98th percentile (431 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 95th percentile (729 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 23rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 98th percentile (43,700 lb)
A · 95EB · MT875BMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 95EFull spec pageChallenger MT875B