ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT225
Utility
- power
- 23.3 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT425
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT425
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT225
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT425
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT425 higher · +175 ci (+255%)MT22568.5 ci
MT425243 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT425 is in the 67th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT425 higher · +1 (+33%)MT2253
MT4254
Median Utility Tractor4
MT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT425 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT425 higher · +4,510 lb (+270%)MT2251,672 lb
MT4256,182 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT425 is in the 58th · 5,107 models
Width
▲ MT425 higher · +36 in (+88%)MT22541 in
MT42577 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
MT225 is in the 4th percentile; MT425 is in the 75th · 3,933 models
MT225 (A)MT425 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT225 | MT425 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3054 | — |
| Power Output | 23.3hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT225+600 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT425+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 243ci | ▲ MT425+175 ci · +255% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.9in | ▲ MT425+0.8 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 5in | ▲ MT425+1.9 in · +61% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | 24-speed power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 105in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 41in | 77in | ▲ MT425+36 in · +88% |
| Height | 75.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,672lb | 6,182lb | ▲ MT425+4,510 lb · +270% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 1 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 694lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 67th percentile (243 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 8th percentile (1,672 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,182 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 4th percentile (41 in)B · 75th percentile (77 in)
A · MT225B · MT425Median Utility Tractor